Honest art in a digital age
ON AI, HONESTLY
Human-made music is, above all else, something to be celebrated and cherished. Live performers deserve our support. Local artists deserve our support. And every person — regardless of background or means — deserves access to affordable music education, instruction, and the joy of participation. That's what this is really about.
Jon Michael Iverson doesn't believe AI should replace the human experience. He believes it can enhance it. Used responsibly and honestly, AI becomes a tool — one that opens doors, sparks curiosity, and invites more people into the world of music, not fewer. That conviction doesn't just shape his perspective. It shapes every creative decision he makes. As a result, Iverson strictly works by his Human-First Code of Ethics for AI Music & Art Creation — a personal framework of nineteen principles designed to ensure that artificial intelligence always remains in service to human creativity, human culture, and human flourishing. Because at the end of the day, it really is that simple: AI is an instrument. Humanity is the music.
HUMAN-FIRST ETHICS
I. WHY THIS DOCUMENT EXISTS
Music has always demanded honesty from the people who make it.
Not just technical honesty — the discipline of craft, the rigor of practice, the commitment to doing the work properly. But a deeper honesty: about intention, about impact, about the responsibility that comes with making something that enters other people's lives and asks for their attention, their trust, and sometimes their most vulnerable moments.
I take that responsibility seriously. I always have.
This page exists because I believe that responsibility has expanded. The arrival of artificial intelligence as a genuine tool of music creation is not a minor development. It is a significant one, and it deserves to be treated as such — with clarity, with care, and with a willingness to say plainly what I believe and how I intend to work.
I am not interested in vague commitments. What follows is specific.
II. ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MUSIC CREATION
I will be direct: I use AI tools in my music creation. I do not believe this requires an apology. I do believe it requires an explanation — and more than that, a standard.
The arrival of AI in creative fields has outpaced the conversation about how to use it responsibly. In many cases, that conversation has barely begun. I think that is a problem, and I think artists have both the opportunity and the obligation to help shape what responsible AI creative practice actually looks like.
These are my commitments:
-
Transparency. I will always be clear when AI tools have been used in the creation of my work. I will not obscure this, minimize it, or allow it to be assumed away. Audiences deserve to know what they are hearing and how it was made.
-
Intentionality. AI is a tool. Like every tool, it is only as meaningful as the intention behind it. I do not use AI to replace musical thinking. I use it as an extension of musical thinking — one that requires the same care, the same judgment, and the same artistic standards I bring to every other aspect of my work.
-
Craft. The fact that a tool makes something easier to produce does not make the result automatically worth producing. I hold AI-assisted work to the same standard I hold everything else: Does it say something? Does it do something? Is it honest? Is it worth someone's time?
-
Attribution and Respect. AI systems are trained on the work of human artists. That fact carries moral weight. I take seriously the ongoing conversation about how AI interacts with existing creative work, and I commit to staying informed, staying engaged, and adjusting my practice as that conversation develops.
-
No Deception. I will not present AI-generated or AI-assisted work as purely human-made. I will not enter AI work into competitions or contexts where its use is prohibited without disclosure. I will not use AI to misrepresent my creative process or my capabilities.
III. ON ARTISTIC ETHICS
Beyond AI, I hold myself to a set of artistic standards that I believe are worth stating plainly.
-
Honesty in the work. I will not make music I do not believe in to satisfy external pressure, trend, or convenience. The work must be genuine, or it is not worth making.
-
Respect for the audience. Every person who listens to my music is extending trust. I do not take that lightly. I will not waste their time, manipulate their emotions carelessly, or treat their attention as a commodity to be exploited.
-
Respect for fellow musicians. This is a hard life. Anyone who has chosen it deserves basic professional respect — credit where credit is due, fair dealing in collaborative work, and a refusal to diminish others in order to elevate myself.
-
Commitment to quality. I believe in doing the work properly. Not perfectly — perfection is not the standard. But properly: with preparation, with care, with genuine effort, and with a willingness to be honest when something isn't ready.
IV. ON COMMUNITY AND ACCESS
I have spent my career in community music. That experience has shaped my ethics as much as anything else.
Music is not only for those who can afford the best seats, the best instruments, or the best training. A commitment to musical ethics includes a commitment to the idea that music belongs to everyone — that access matters, that participation matters, and that the health of musical culture depends on how broadly and how genuinely it is shared.
I will not use my platform, my work, or my voice in ways that contradict that belief.
V. A NOTE ON PRECEDENT
I am aware that I am working at an unusual moment.
AI music creation is new enough that the standards are still being written — or in many cases, not yet written at all. I do not think that ambiguity is an excuse for carelessness. I think it is an invitation to be deliberate.
I want the work I make and the way I make it to contribute something useful to the larger conversation about what ethical AI creative practice looks like. Not because I think I have all the answers, but because I think artists need to be part of finding them — and because silence from working artists is not a neutral position. It is an abdication.
I am not willing to abdicate. These are my standards. I intend to hold them.
— JMI, Minneapolis, August 2026